The role of verbalisations and anxiety in task switching
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review
Standard Standard
2022. Paper presented at Meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society, Keele, United Kingdom.
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - CONF
T1 - The role of verbalisations and anxiety in task switching
AU - Baxendale, Alex
AU - Mari-Beffa, Paloma
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - It has been suggested that being anxious can occupy verbal working memory, a type of memory required for goal activation in cognitively intensive tasks. Likewise, during these tasks it has been found that boosting task related verbal working memory have been found to improve performance, e.g., listening to or reading aloud instructions (Kirkham et al., 2012). This experiment seeks toreplicate the previous work whilst accounting for trait anxiety. We used a task-switching alternating runs paradigm where auditory and visual instructions appeared simultaneously. Participants had to follow either the auditory or visual cue in separate blocks, whilst ignoring the counterpart. The distractor cue could be congruent or incongruent with the target rule. Results showed that lowanxious individuals greatly benefit from auditory cues, whilst high anxious individuals saw no differences. The data suggests that the verbal working memory used for cognitive control is based more in phonological grounding, and that anxious individuals do not benefit from hearing task instructions as they are already engaged in phonological ruminations.
AB - It has been suggested that being anxious can occupy verbal working memory, a type of memory required for goal activation in cognitively intensive tasks. Likewise, during these tasks it has been found that boosting task related verbal working memory have been found to improve performance, e.g., listening to or reading aloud instructions (Kirkham et al., 2012). This experiment seeks toreplicate the previous work whilst accounting for trait anxiety. We used a task-switching alternating runs paradigm where auditory and visual instructions appeared simultaneously. Participants had to follow either the auditory or visual cue in separate blocks, whilst ignoring the counterpart. The distractor cue could be congruent or incongruent with the target rule. Results showed that lowanxious individuals greatly benefit from auditory cues, whilst high anxious individuals saw no differences. The data suggests that the verbal working memory used for cognitive control is based more in phonological grounding, and that anxious individuals do not benefit from hearing task instructions as they are already engaged in phonological ruminations.
KW - Anxiety
KW - Self-talk
KW - Mixing Costs
UR - https://eps.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/EPS-Keele-Programme-30.03.2.pdf
M3 - Paper
T2 - Meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society
Y2 - 30 March 2022 through 1 April 2022
ER -