The Sorry Tale of British Journalism and our Right to Privacy
Research output: Other contribution
Electronic versions
Links
- http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/human-rights-committee/human-rights-attitudes-to-enforcement/written/80564.html
Final published version
Licence: Unspecified
Other documents
- Bakir & McStay 2018 JCHR
200 KB, PDF document
1.1 Focusing on privacy, we address the inquiry’s questions on cultural factors in ensuring that human rights are respected.
1.2 We show how British journalism does a poor job in promoting the right to privacy, especially given its demonstrable preference for a counter-narrative promoted by the intelligence elite on the importance of surveillance for national security. To explain this, we draw on published academic work on the 2013 leaks by National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower, Edward Snowden, on mass surveillance.
1.3 We recommend that:
- Journalists should be encouraged to reject a simplistic binary narrative of surveillance
versus privacy: there are many shades of complexity within these issues.
- Journalists should not automatically privilege intelligence elite sources (especially
intelligence agencies and their political mouthpieces) but should give more prominence to those pointing out the human rights implications of security practices.
1.2 We show how British journalism does a poor job in promoting the right to privacy, especially given its demonstrable preference for a counter-narrative promoted by the intelligence elite on the importance of surveillance for national security. To explain this, we draw on published academic work on the 2013 leaks by National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower, Edward Snowden, on mass surveillance.
1.3 We recommend that:
- Journalists should be encouraged to reject a simplistic binary narrative of surveillance
versus privacy: there are many shades of complexity within these issues.
- Journalists should not automatically privilege intelligence elite sources (especially
intelligence agencies and their political mouthpieces) but should give more prominence to those pointing out the human rights implications of security practices.
Keywords
- judiciary, surveillance, journalism, privacy, human rights
Original language | English |
---|---|
Type | Written evidence for House of Lords JCHR Inquiry on Human Rights: Attitudes to Enforcement |
Medium of output | online |
Publisher | UK Parliament |
Number of pages | 9 |
Place of Publication | London |
Publication status | Published - 22 Mar 2018 |
Publication series
Name | House of Lords JCHR Inquiry on Human Rights: Attitudes to Enforcement |
---|