The sovereign-bank rating channel and rating agencies' downgrades during the European debt crisis
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 49, No. part B, 13.04.2014, p. 235-257.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The sovereign-bank rating channel and rating agencies' downgrades during the European debt crisis
AU - ap Gwilym, O.M.
AU - Alsakka, R.
AU - Ap Gwilym, O.
AU - Vu, T.N.
PY - 2014/4/13
Y1 - 2014/4/13
N2 - We investigate the rating channel for the transmission of changes in sovereign risk to the banking sector, analysing data from Moody's, SandP and Fitch before and during the European debt crisis. Sovereign rating downgrades and negative watch signals have strong effects on bank rating downgrades in the crisis period. The impact is stronger for multiple-notch sovereign rating downgrades, and more pronounced in PIIGS countries. Secondly, we investigate rating agencies' competition in the banking sector during the same periods, finding significant differences in rating policies across the agencies. SandP credit actions tend to be the more independent ones, while Moody's appears to be more cautious, although it is by far the most likely to assign multiple-notch downgrades. In the pre-crisis period, we find no evidence that bank rating actions are linked to sovereign rating signals (nor vice versa) nor to prior bank rating changes by a competing agency.
AB - We investigate the rating channel for the transmission of changes in sovereign risk to the banking sector, analysing data from Moody's, SandP and Fitch before and during the European debt crisis. Sovereign rating downgrades and negative watch signals have strong effects on bank rating downgrades in the crisis period. The impact is stronger for multiple-notch sovereign rating downgrades, and more pronounced in PIIGS countries. Secondly, we investigate rating agencies' competition in the banking sector during the same periods, finding significant differences in rating policies across the agencies. SandP credit actions tend to be the more independent ones, while Moody's appears to be more cautious, although it is by far the most likely to assign multiple-notch downgrades. In the pre-crisis period, we find no evidence that bank rating actions are linked to sovereign rating signals (nor vice versa) nor to prior bank rating changes by a competing agency.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.03.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.03.012
M3 - Article
VL - 49
SP - 235
EP - 257
JO - Journal of International Money and Finance
JF - Journal of International Money and Finance
SN - 0261-5606
IS - part B
ER -