Understanding policy implementation processes as self-organizing systems
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Public Management Review, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2008, p. 421-440.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding policy implementation processes as self-organizing systems
AU - Butler, Michael J.R.
AU - Allen, Peter M.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Implementation studies and related research in organizational theory can be enhanced by drawing on the field of complex systems to understand better and, as a consequence, more successfully manage change. This article reinterprets data previously published in the British Journal of Management to reveal a new contribution, that policy implementation processes should be understood as a self-organizing system in which adaptive abilities are extremely important for stakeholders. In other words, national policy is reinterpreted at the local level, with each local organization uniquely mixing elements of national policy with their own requirements making policy implementation unpredictable and more sketchy. The original article explained different paces and directions of change in terms of traditional management processes: leadership, politics, implementation and vision. By reinterpreting the data, it is possible to reveal that deeper level processes, which are more emergent, are also at work influencing change, which the authors label possibility space. Implications for theory, policy and practice are identified.
AB - Implementation studies and related research in organizational theory can be enhanced by drawing on the field of complex systems to understand better and, as a consequence, more successfully manage change. This article reinterprets data previously published in the British Journal of Management to reveal a new contribution, that policy implementation processes should be understood as a self-organizing system in which adaptive abilities are extremely important for stakeholders. In other words, national policy is reinterpreted at the local level, with each local organization uniquely mixing elements of national policy with their own requirements making policy implementation unpredictable and more sketchy. The original article explained different paces and directions of change in terms of traditional management processes: leadership, politics, implementation and vision. By reinterpreting the data, it is possible to reveal that deeper level processes, which are more emergent, are also at work influencing change, which the authors label possibility space. Implications for theory, policy and practice are identified.
KW - complexity
KW - change management
KW - policy implementation
KW - receptivity
KW - self-organizing systems
U2 - 10.1080/14719030802002923
DO - 10.1080/14719030802002923
M3 - Article
VL - 10
SP - 421
EP - 440
JO - Public Management Review
JF - Public Management Review
SN - 1471-9037
IS - 3
ER -