Understanding policy implementation processes as self-organizing systems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Understanding policy implementation processes as self-organizing systems. / Butler, Michael J.R.; Allen, Peter M.
In: Public Management Review, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2008, p. 421-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Butler MJR, Allen PM. Understanding policy implementation processes as self-organizing systems. Public Management Review. 2008;10(3):421-440. doi: 10.1080/14719030802002923

Author

Butler, Michael J.R. ; Allen, Peter M. / Understanding policy implementation processes as self-organizing systems. In: Public Management Review. 2008 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 421-440.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding policy implementation processes as self-organizing systems

AU - Butler, Michael J.R.

AU - Allen, Peter M.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Implementation studies and related research in organizational theory can be enhanced by drawing on the field of complex systems to understand better and, as a consequence, more successfully manage change. This article reinterprets data previously published in the British Journal of Management to reveal a new contribution, that policy implementation processes should be understood as a self-organizing system in which adaptive abilities are extremely important for stakeholders. In other words, national policy is reinterpreted at the local level, with each local organization uniquely mixing elements of national policy with their own requirements making policy implementation unpredictable and more sketchy. The original article explained different paces and directions of change in terms of traditional management processes: leadership, politics, implementation and vision. By reinterpreting the data, it is possible to reveal that deeper level processes, which are more emergent, are also at work influencing change, which the authors label possibility space. Implications for theory, policy and practice are identified.

AB - Implementation studies and related research in organizational theory can be enhanced by drawing on the field of complex systems to understand better and, as a consequence, more successfully manage change. This article reinterprets data previously published in the British Journal of Management to reveal a new contribution, that policy implementation processes should be understood as a self-organizing system in which adaptive abilities are extremely important for stakeholders. In other words, national policy is reinterpreted at the local level, with each local organization uniquely mixing elements of national policy with their own requirements making policy implementation unpredictable and more sketchy. The original article explained different paces and directions of change in terms of traditional management processes: leadership, politics, implementation and vision. By reinterpreting the data, it is possible to reveal that deeper level processes, which are more emergent, are also at work influencing change, which the authors label possibility space. Implications for theory, policy and practice are identified.

KW - complexity

KW - change management

KW - policy implementation

KW - receptivity

KW - self-organizing systems

U2 - 10.1080/14719030802002923

DO - 10.1080/14719030802002923

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 421

EP - 440

JO - Public Management Review

JF - Public Management Review

SN - 1471-9037

IS - 3

ER -