What drives differences of opinion in sovereign ratings? The roles of information disclosure and political risk
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Electronic versions
Documents
- 2017 What Drives Differences of Opinion
Accepted author manuscript, 808 KB, PDF document
Licence: CC BY-NC Show licence
This paper investigates the causes of split sovereign ratings across S&P, Moody’s and Fitch for 64 countries from 1997 to 2011. We identify that split sovereign ratings are not symmetric, with S&P tending to be the most conservative agency. We find that opaque sovereigns are more likely to receive split ratings. Political risk plays a highly significant role in explaining split ratings and dominates economic and financial indicators. Out-of-sample model performance is enhanced by capturing political risk. Government information disclosure affects split ratings between Moody’s and Fitch in emerging countries. The study implies an incentive for governments to reduce political uncertainty and to enhance transparency.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 216-233 |
| Journal | International Journal of Finance and Economics |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 27 Apr 2017 |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2017 |
Total downloads
No data available