World knowledge and novel information integration during L2 Speech comprehension
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Vol. 20, No. 3, 05.2017, p. 576-587.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - World knowledge and novel information integration during L2 Speech comprehension
AU - Romero-Rivas, C.
AU - Corey, J.D.
AU - Garcia, X.
AU - Thierry, G.L.
AU - Martin, C.D.
AU - Costa, A.
N1 - FPI grant (BES-2012-056668) and two project grants (PSI2011-23033 and Consolider INGENIO CSD2007-00012) awarded by the Spanish Government; European Research Council under the European Community’s Seventh Framework (FP7/2007-2013 Cooperation grant agreement 613465-AThEME)
PY - 2017/5
Y1 - 2017/5
N2 - In this study we explore whether world knowledge (WK) processing differs between individuals listening to their native (L1) or their non-native (L2) language. We recorded event-related brain potentials in L1 and L2 speakers of Spanish while they listened to sentences uttered by native speakers of Spanish. Sentences were either congruent or incongruent with participants’ WK. In addition, participants also listened to sentences in which upcoming words could not be anticipated on the basis of WK. WK violations elicited a late negativity of greater magnitude and duration in the L2 than the L1 group. However, sentences in which WK was not helpful regarding word anticipation elicited similar N400 modulations in both groups. These results suggest that WK processing requires a deeper lexical search in L2 comprehension than in L1 comprehension.
AB - In this study we explore whether world knowledge (WK) processing differs between individuals listening to their native (L1) or their non-native (L2) language. We recorded event-related brain potentials in L1 and L2 speakers of Spanish while they listened to sentences uttered by native speakers of Spanish. Sentences were either congruent or incongruent with participants’ WK. In addition, participants also listened to sentences in which upcoming words could not be anticipated on the basis of WK. WK violations elicited a late negativity of greater magnitude and duration in the L2 than the L1 group. However, sentences in which WK was not helpful regarding word anticipation elicited similar N400 modulations in both groups. These results suggest that WK processing requires a deeper lexical search in L2 comprehension than in L1 comprehension.
U2 - 10.1017/S1366728915000905
DO - 10.1017/S1366728915000905
M3 - Article
VL - 20
SP - 576
EP - 587
JO - Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
JF - Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
IS - 3
ER -