Identifying 'Exclusionary Agreements': Agreement Type as a Procedural Limitation in UNCLOS Dispute Settlement

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

Fersiynau electronig

Dogfennau

Dangosydd eitem ddigidol (DOI)

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is heralded as a constitution for the oceans, and as part of this, provides for a compulsory dispute settlement procedure entailing binding decisions. However, case law and academic commentary have highlighted significant issues in definitively identifying other agreements that could preclude these compulsory procedures – a concept permitted by the Convention in certain circumstances. This paper begins to explore this challenge by contending that the type of agreement plays a significant role in whether or not it could be determined to be an ‘exclusionary agreement’. In doing so, the article conducts a systematic interpretation of Articles 281 and 282 UNCLOS, underpinned by the application of relevant provisions in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. This provides a conclusive basis as to whether the status of an agreement as an ‘ad hoc agreement’ (specific; adopted for the dispute) or an ‘existing agreement’ (general; adopted prior to the dispute) holds any significance in the context of these articles.

Allweddeiriau

Iaith wreiddiolSaesneg
Tudalennau (o-i)113-142
CyfnodolynOcean Development & International Law
Cyfrol52
Rhif y cyfnodolyn2
Dyddiad ar-lein cynnar5 Maw 2021
Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs)
StatwsCyhoeddwyd - 26 Mai 2021

Cyfanswm lawlrlwytho

Nid oes data ar gael
Gweld graff cysylltiadau