Blunt instruments or intelligent solutions?
Electronic versions
- Raimund Karl - Speaker
Description
Compared to the UK the heritage laws in Germany and Austria are much more restrictive when it comes to metal detecting. But are these stricter laws really an effective deterrent? If so, the number of metal detectorists should be higher in the UK than it is in Austria and Germany. However, due to the stricter laws, the actual number of metal detectorists in the latter two countries is unknown.
To compare numbers of metal detectorists in the countries mentioned above, this case study looks at metal detecting online fora, especially their membership numbers. These indicate that there are more metal detectorists in Germany than there are in the UK. This suggests that laws alone do not prevent people from looking for archaeological material. Laws do, however, influence other patterns of behaviour, particularly the reporting of finds to the authorities by their finders. Stricter laws do not seem to deter metal detecting, they deter finds reporting.
Thus, to ensure that as much archaeological information as possible is preserved or recovered and recorded properly by its finders, another solution must be found. Allowing for more public participation in archaeology in Austria and Germany might be one way to achieve this goal.
To compare numbers of metal detectorists in the countries mentioned above, this case study looks at metal detecting online fora, especially their membership numbers. These indicate that there are more metal detectorists in Germany than there are in the UK. This suggests that laws alone do not prevent people from looking for archaeological material. Laws do, however, influence other patterns of behaviour, particularly the reporting of finds to the authorities by their finders. Stricter laws do not seem to deter metal detecting, they deter finds reporting.
Thus, to ensure that as much archaeological information as possible is preserved or recovered and recorded properly by its finders, another solution must be found. Allowing for more public participation in archaeology in Austria and Germany might be one way to achieve this goal.
1 Sept 2016
Event (Conference)
Title | 22nd Annual Meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists |
---|---|
Period | 31/08/16 → 4/09/16 |
Web address (URL) | |
Location | University of Vilnius |
City | Vilnius |
Country/Territory | Lithuania |
Degree of recognition | International event |
Event (Conference)
Title | 22nd Annual Meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists |
---|---|
Date | 31/08/16 → 4/09/16 |
Website | |
Location | University of Vilnius |
City | Vilnius |
Country/Territory | Lithuania |
Degree of recognition | International event |
Keywords
- Archaeology, Austria, Heritage management, Heritage law, Germany, United Kingdom, Metal detecting
Research outputs (3)
- Published
An empirical examination of metal detecting. Per capita numbers of metal detectorists in a British-German comparison.
Research output: Other contribution
- Published
Archaeological Responses to 5 Decades of Metal Detecting in Austria
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
- Published
Empirische Untersuchung des Verhältnisses der Anzahl von MetallsucherInnen im deutsch-britischen Vergleich: Oder: wie wenig Einfluss die Gesetzeslage hat
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Prof. activities and awards (2)
Who commits ‘heritage crimes’? Archaeology, the law, and civil rights in Austria
Activity: Talk or presentation › Oral presentation
22nd Annual Meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists
Activity: Participating in or organising an event › Participation in Academic conference