Authority and Subject (in the Archaeological Discourse in Austria and Germany)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Electronic versions

Documents

DOI

The primary task of archaeological heritage management is to represent the public interest in archaeology. How this is constituted and determined has changed significantly over the past 200 years. As this paper demonstrates, a modern, egalitarian, democratic approach has yet to be established within Austrian and German archaeological heritage management: the relationship between heritage management bureaucracy and the civic subject is anachronistic, stuck in a pre-1848 Revolution mindset. Due to the lack of a public discourse and the nature of scholarly engagement with archaeological heritage management, the power of (state) archaeologists is not imaginary, but very real.

Keywords

  • ARCHAEOLOGY, Heritage, Heritage law, Heritage management
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-158
Number of pages22
JournalArchaeologies - Journal of the World archaeology Congress
Volume16
Issue number1
Early online date5 Mar 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2020
Event23rd annual meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists: Building Bridges - MECC, Maastricht, Netherlands
Duration: 30 Aug 20173 Sept 2017
http://www.eaa2017maastricht.nl/

Research outputs (3)

View all

Prof. activities and awards (2)

View all

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations