British and Irish newspapers implicitly support single-use masks over reusable face coverings
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Electronic versions
Documents
- SM-FC-FM_AugustRevised_01
Accepted author manuscript, 589 KB, PDF document
Licence: CC BY Show licence
DOI
Introduction: The environmental impact of waste caused by single-use masks or face coverings is an under-considered effect associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. The combination of the protective purpose of face masks and their potential environmental impacts through littering or waste management means the wearing of face masks is simultaneously associated with the health crisis and creation of a new environmental challenge, combining two strands of journalism. Methods: Our study demonstrates how the discourse in British and Irish newspapers in the March 2020-December 2021 time frame relates to this problem. By a combination of quantitative and qualitative discourse analysis, we identify concepts commonly associated with the terms “face-covering” and “mask,” particularly concerning whether they refer to a disposable or reusable item. Results: Results suggest that the newspaper discourse generally favored references to single-use surgical masks. Newspapers reported on the environmental impact of face masks only in very limited ways. Discussion: We propose that the increase in waste caused by face masks can be related to prevailing representations of single-use surgical masks and limited attention paid to environmental concerns.
Keywords
- newspaper discourse, mask, face covering, Covid 19, environment, litter
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 1256349 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Frontiers in Communication |
Volume | 8 |
Early online date | 4 Oct 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2023 |
Total downloads
No data available