Cooperative intelligence and recipient design as drivers for language biases in homesign systems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Cooperative intelligence and recipient design as drivers for language biases in homesign systems. / Evans, V.F.; Evans, V.
In: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, Vol. 30, No. 8, 02.04.2015, p. 912-914.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Evans, VF & Evans, V 2015, 'Cooperative intelligence and recipient design as drivers for language biases in homesign systems', Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 912-914. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1027237

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Evans VF, Evans V. Cooperative intelligence and recipient design as drivers for language biases in homesign systems. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 2015 Apr 2;30(8):912-914. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1027237

Author

Evans, V.F. ; Evans, V. / Cooperative intelligence and recipient design as drivers for language biases in homesign systems. In: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 8. pp. 912-914.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cooperative intelligence and recipient design as drivers for language biases in homesign systems

AU - Evans, V.F.

AU - Evans, V.

PY - 2015/4/2

Y1 - 2015/4/2

N2 - In discussing the resilient properties of language, evidenced in homesign communication systems, Goldin-Meadow observes that children, faced with genuine poverty of the stimulus, appear to be bringing their own biases to language construction/acquisition. How, then, do we account for such biases? One possibility is that the cooperative intelligence that makes language possible provides a basis for recipient design which brings such biases with it. These may arise from an embodied basis of communication, thereby providing the design space for a communication system fit for purpose

AB - In discussing the resilient properties of language, evidenced in homesign communication systems, Goldin-Meadow observes that children, faced with genuine poverty of the stimulus, appear to be bringing their own biases to language construction/acquisition. How, then, do we account for such biases? One possibility is that the cooperative intelligence that makes language possible provides a basis for recipient design which brings such biases with it. These may arise from an embodied basis of communication, thereby providing the design space for a communication system fit for purpose

U2 - 10.1080/23273798.2015.1027237

DO - 10.1080/23273798.2015.1027237

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 912

EP - 914

JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

SN - 2327-3798

IS - 8

ER -