Covid and the coalfield: Covid-19 vaccine hesitance in Wales and Appalachia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Covid and the coalfield: Covid-19 vaccine hesitance in Wales and Appalachia. / Saville, Christopher; Mann, Robin; Lockard, Anthony Scott et al.
In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 337, 116295, 11.2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Saville, C, Mann, R, Lockard, AS, Bark-Connell, A, Gabuljah, SG, Young, A & Thomas, DR 2023, 'Covid and the coalfield: Covid-19 vaccine hesitance in Wales and Appalachia', Social Science and Medicine, vol. 337, 116295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116295

APA

Saville, C., Mann, R., Lockard, A. S., Bark-Connell, A., Gabuljah, S. G., Young, A., & Thomas, D. R. (2023). Covid and the coalfield: Covid-19 vaccine hesitance in Wales and Appalachia. Social Science and Medicine, 337, Article 116295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116295

CBE

Saville C, Mann R, Lockard AS, Bark-Connell A, Gabuljah SG, Young A, Thomas DR. 2023. Covid and the coalfield: Covid-19 vaccine hesitance in Wales and Appalachia. Social Science and Medicine. 337:Article 116295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116295

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Saville C, Mann R, Lockard AS, Bark-Connell A, Gabuljah SG, Young A et al. Covid and the coalfield: Covid-19 vaccine hesitance in Wales and Appalachia. Social Science and Medicine. 2023 Nov;337:116295. Epub 2023 Oct 13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116295

Author

Saville, Christopher ; Mann, Robin ; Lockard, Anthony Scott et al. / Covid and the coalfield: Covid-19 vaccine hesitance in Wales and Appalachia. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2023 ; Vol. 337.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Covid and the coalfield: Covid-19 vaccine hesitance in Wales and Appalachia

AU - Saville, Christopher

AU - Mann, Robin

AU - Lockard, Anthony Scott

AU - Bark-Connell, Aidan

AU - Gabuljah, Stella Gmekpebi

AU - Young, April

AU - Thomas, Daniel Rhys

PY - 2023/11

Y1 - 2023/11

N2 - BackgroundVaccine hesitancy is a barrier to Covid-19 vaccine uptake and displays a social gradient, compounding health disparities. While social gradients are a vital concept in health, they flatten distinctions between types of disadvantaged community. This paper focuses on vaccine hesitance in post-industrial and de-industrialising coalfields. The social consequences of the decline of coal mining may present barriers to vaccine uptake.MethodsWe ran parallel surveys in Wales (N=4187) and US states overlapping with central Appalachia (N=4864), to examine whether vaccine attitudes and uptake varied between areas with different coal mining histories. These surveys were accompanied by qualitative interviews of 36 residents of these coalfields to explore vaccination decisions and triangulate with survey data. ResultsFactor analysis identified four axes of attitudes in the survey data: vaccine confidence, covid scepticism, vaccine individualism, and concerned confusion. These themes were echoed in the interviews. Vaccine confidence was lower; and covid scepticism, vaccine individualism, and concerned confusion higher, in residents of areas of Wales with greater mining extent and where pits closed during certain periods. Residents of former US coal counties had lower vaccine confidence and higher covid scepticism, while those in current coal counties had greater vaccine individualism and concerned confusion. In former US coal counties and Welsh areas where pits closed since 1980, vaccine uptake was lower. Differences could not be explained by respondents’ income and education. In the interviews, norms of social solidarity were often invoked by vaccinated respondents, while unvaccinated respondents did not frame decisions in the context of the industrial history of their areas.DiscussionThe legacy of coal-mining’s decline presents barriers to public health campaigns. We show evidence of this across two historically significant coalfields. Attention is needed to avert negative public health consequences of global energy transition.

AB - BackgroundVaccine hesitancy is a barrier to Covid-19 vaccine uptake and displays a social gradient, compounding health disparities. While social gradients are a vital concept in health, they flatten distinctions between types of disadvantaged community. This paper focuses on vaccine hesitance in post-industrial and de-industrialising coalfields. The social consequences of the decline of coal mining may present barriers to vaccine uptake.MethodsWe ran parallel surveys in Wales (N=4187) and US states overlapping with central Appalachia (N=4864), to examine whether vaccine attitudes and uptake varied between areas with different coal mining histories. These surveys were accompanied by qualitative interviews of 36 residents of these coalfields to explore vaccination decisions and triangulate with survey data. ResultsFactor analysis identified four axes of attitudes in the survey data: vaccine confidence, covid scepticism, vaccine individualism, and concerned confusion. These themes were echoed in the interviews. Vaccine confidence was lower; and covid scepticism, vaccine individualism, and concerned confusion higher, in residents of areas of Wales with greater mining extent and where pits closed during certain periods. Residents of former US coal counties had lower vaccine confidence and higher covid scepticism, while those in current coal counties had greater vaccine individualism and concerned confusion. In former US coal counties and Welsh areas where pits closed since 1980, vaccine uptake was lower. Differences could not be explained by respondents’ income and education. In the interviews, norms of social solidarity were often invoked by vaccinated respondents, while unvaccinated respondents did not frame decisions in the context of the industrial history of their areas.DiscussionThe legacy of coal-mining’s decline presents barriers to public health campaigns. We show evidence of this across two historically significant coalfields. Attention is needed to avert negative public health consequences of global energy transition.

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116295

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116295

M3 - Article

VL - 337

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

M1 - 116295

ER -