Instrumenting(s): Accounting a Series of Repetitive Beats
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
Standard Standard
In: Amicus Curiae, Vol. 6, No. 2, 07.02.2025, p. 472-488.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Instrumenting(s): Accounting a Series of Repetitive Beats
AU - Finchett-Maddock, Lucy
AU - Hignell-Tull, Daniel
AU - Hultkvist, Anders
PY - 2025/2/7
Y1 - 2025/2/7
N2 - This Visual Law article accounts an event “A Royal Dis-Sent –Re-Writing and Re-Imagining a Series of Repetitive Beats CJA1994” held at House of Annetta, on London’s Brick Lane, onSunday 3 November 2024. On that day it was 30 years sincethe notorious Criminal Justice and Public Order Act (CJA) 1994was given royal assent, illegalizing raves, banning music that“includes sounds wholly or predominantly characterized by theemission of a succession of repetitive beats” (section 63(1)(B)).Discussions as to the nature of sound and law are unravelled,considering prohibition, nomadism, repetition and propertyconcerning the connections found between law, music andaesthetics that the CJA 1994 and the workshop highlighted.The summary relays the work of event organizers Dr DanielHignell-Tully and Dr Lucy Finchett-Maddock under the guise oftransdisciplinary project “Instrumenting(s)”, investigating therelations between sound, property and law, and how we maybest understand the history of land within legalities and theirresistances via a combination of legal, scientific and artisticresearch through the development of a “geosocial instrument”.
AB - This Visual Law article accounts an event “A Royal Dis-Sent –Re-Writing and Re-Imagining a Series of Repetitive Beats CJA1994” held at House of Annetta, on London’s Brick Lane, onSunday 3 November 2024. On that day it was 30 years sincethe notorious Criminal Justice and Public Order Act (CJA) 1994was given royal assent, illegalizing raves, banning music that“includes sounds wholly or predominantly characterized by theemission of a succession of repetitive beats” (section 63(1)(B)).Discussions as to the nature of sound and law are unravelled,considering prohibition, nomadism, repetition and propertyconcerning the connections found between law, music andaesthetics that the CJA 1994 and the workshop highlighted.The summary relays the work of event organizers Dr DanielHignell-Tully and Dr Lucy Finchett-Maddock under the guise oftransdisciplinary project “Instrumenting(s)”, investigating therelations between sound, property and law, and how we maybest understand the history of land within legalities and theirresistances via a combination of legal, scientific and artisticresearch through the development of a “geosocial instrument”.
M3 - Article
VL - 6
SP - 472
EP - 488
JO - Amicus Curiae
JF - Amicus Curiae
IS - 2
ER -