TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevention of Postpartum Haemorrhage: Economic evaluation of the novel Butterfly device in a UK setting

AU - Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor

AU - Ezeofor, Victory

AU - Bryning, Lucy

AU - Anthony, Bethany

AU - Charles, Joanna

AU - Weeks , Andrew

PY - 2023/4

Y1 - 2023/4

N2 - ObjectivesTo explore the cost-effectiveness of a novel PPH device as compared with usual care.DesignA decision analytical model was used to explore the cost-effectiveness of the PPH Butterfly device compared with usual care. This was part of a United Kingdom, UK, clinical trial ISRCTN15452399 using a matched historical cohort who had standard PPH management without the use of the PPH Butterfly device. The economic evaluation was conducted from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective.SettingLiverpool Women’s Hospital, UK.Participants57 women with 113 matched controls.InterventionThe PPH Butterfly is a novel device that has been invented and developed in the UK to facilitate bimanual compression of the uterus in the treatment of PPH.Main outcome measuresMain outcome measures included healthcare costs, blood loss, and maternal morbidity events.ResultsMean treatment costs in the Butterfly cohort were £3,459.66 as compared with standard care £3,223.93. Treatment with the Butterfly device resulted in decreased total blood loss in comparison with standard care. The Butterfly device had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £3,795.78 per PPH progression avoided (defined as ≤ 1000 ml additional blood loss from device insertion point). If the NHS is prepared to pay £8,500 per PPH progression avoided, then the Butterfly device is cost-effective with a probability of 87 percent. In the PPH Butterfly treatment arm there were 9% fewer cases of massive obstetric haemorrhage (severe PPH of more than 2000mls or more than 4 units of blood transfusion required) recorded as compared with the standard care historical cohort. As a low-cost device, the PPH Butterfly device is cost-effective but can be cost-saving to the NHS.ConclusionThe PPH pathway can result in high-cost resource use such as blood transfusion or high dependence unit hospital stays. The Butterfly device is a relative low-cost device in a UK NHS setting with a high probability of being cost-effective. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) can use this evidence in considering the adoption of innovative technologies such as the Butterfly device in the NHS. Extrapolation on an international scale to lower and middle-income countries could prevent mortality associated with PPH.

AB - ObjectivesTo explore the cost-effectiveness of a novel PPH device as compared with usual care.DesignA decision analytical model was used to explore the cost-effectiveness of the PPH Butterfly device compared with usual care. This was part of a United Kingdom, UK, clinical trial ISRCTN15452399 using a matched historical cohort who had standard PPH management without the use of the PPH Butterfly device. The economic evaluation was conducted from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective.SettingLiverpool Women’s Hospital, UK.Participants57 women with 113 matched controls.InterventionThe PPH Butterfly is a novel device that has been invented and developed in the UK to facilitate bimanual compression of the uterus in the treatment of PPH.Main outcome measuresMain outcome measures included healthcare costs, blood loss, and maternal morbidity events.ResultsMean treatment costs in the Butterfly cohort were £3,459.66 as compared with standard care £3,223.93. Treatment with the Butterfly device resulted in decreased total blood loss in comparison with standard care. The Butterfly device had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £3,795.78 per PPH progression avoided (defined as ≤ 1000 ml additional blood loss from device insertion point). If the NHS is prepared to pay £8,500 per PPH progression avoided, then the Butterfly device is cost-effective with a probability of 87 percent. In the PPH Butterfly treatment arm there were 9% fewer cases of massive obstetric haemorrhage (severe PPH of more than 2000mls or more than 4 units of blood transfusion required) recorded as compared with the standard care historical cohort. As a low-cost device, the PPH Butterfly device is cost-effective but can be cost-saving to the NHS.ConclusionThe PPH pathway can result in high-cost resource use such as blood transfusion or high dependence unit hospital stays. The Butterfly device is a relative low-cost device in a UK NHS setting with a high probability of being cost-effective. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) can use this evidence in considering the adoption of innovative technologies such as the Butterfly device in the NHS. Extrapolation on an international scale to lower and middle-income countries could prevent mortality associated with PPH.

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Decision modelling

KW - Decision trees

KW - Medical device pricing

KW - Postpartum haemorrhage

KW - Butterfly device

KW - Women

KW - Childbirth

KW - Health Economics

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.02.020

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.02.020

M3 - Article

VL - 283

SP - 149

EP - 157

JO - European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

JF - European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

SN - 0301-2115

ER -